Who wins our “elections”? Not us.

Usually, I poke fun of the Hong Kong elections I’m allowed to vote in –  the  half-hearted campaigning, the typos in the crappy pamphlets, the fact that the winners have reasonably limited powers anyway, since only half our Legislature is elected by the people.
But I walk over to my neighborhood poll station and cast my vote every time.
Even the dinkiest district elections are better than what we had today, which I don’t call an “election,” since  there were only 1,193 hand-chosen elites — out of a population of 7 million –  allowed to have a say in the chief executive, the guy who heads the government that spends my taxes and runs the city I live in.
In the end, they “chose” a guy named C.Y. Leung. Though how much they actually chose — or were told to choose by Beijing — I don’t know.
Maybe I shouldn’t call them “elites” either. The tycoons, etc., are elites. But who are the rest?
According to a relative in a New Territories village, there were guys going door to door last year asking for their vote, so that they could vote on the villagers’ behalf for chief executive.
How complicated. 
“Why can’t we just vote directly?” the campaigning guy was asked, and he had no answer.
My relative added that this guy had a mainland accent, no campaign materials, and no idea about local issues. He couldn’t answer simple questions about his political position or platform, much less how he could help the people he was talking to.
Meanwhile, another family member wrote this on his Facebook  today. “Over 200,000 people made their voices heard in the pseudo election! This city is not dead yet.”
(He was referring to the 220,000 Hong Kongers who participated in a mock vote held by a university — one that mainland hackers tried to ruin.  For a nicely written blog post about that, go to Journey to Hong Kong.)
It’s  interesting for me to see how my extended family reacts to these things, since they have nothing to do with the news, politics, blogging, etc. They’re just ordinary working folk.
There have been reports that the Chinese government office here have been calling publishers and editors to rewrite columns — to say good things about their chosen candidate, and to not print negative things about Beijing interference. I hope that’s not true, because we don’t want a censored, state-run media like the one on the mainland.
Here’s what I don’t get. Let’s set aside the debate of how and when and if Hong Kong should be a democracy, since that’s a whole other blog post.
Currently, Hong Kong is not a democracy. So why does it pretend to be one?
If Beijing is just going to hand-pick the guy they like, why bother with the facade of having people run public campaigns? Why bother “consulting” villagers and Chinese traditional doctors? Who is fooled into thinking that Hong Kong acupuncturists are choosing our leaders? For whose benefit is this song and dance?
Why bother hacking into a mock election held by a local university? What’s the point of interfering in newspapers if — at the end of the day — they get to choose their man anyway?
They have a guaranteed win. Are our leaders so insecure that they also have to manufacture a false sense that everyone agrees with them?
What’s an “election” without conspiracy theories? America still has its “birthers”. Here are a few I heard around HK:
- By switching sides from Henry Tang to C.Y. Leung, Beijing lost the support of a traditional ally, the pro-business folk like tycoons and the Liberal Party.  
- Beijing is going to punish Hong Kong tycoons for not backing their Chosen One.
-  The government timed the election for the Rugby 7s weekend — the biggest expat sporting event of the year — so that socially conscious foreigners would be too busy (ahem, drunk off their faces) to make a fuss.
- The controversy over the high-level hob-nobbing  Donald Tsang was just a way to detract from even worse controversy over the wife-cheating, illegal basement-building Henry Tang, who was Beijing’s favorite until recently.
(Please note that I do say “conspiracy theory” above. I don’t know if any of these are true.)
Another interesting tid-bit. During the campaign mud-slinging, one insult hurled at C.Y. Leung is that he is (or was) a member of the ruling Chinese Communist Party, which he denied. The local CCP is practically an underground  society here. While Hong Kong politicians will admit to sitting on various Chinese government boards, etc., few in their right mind would admit to being card-carrying CCP members.
And yet, that’s the Party in charge of the country that runs us. It’s all so very weird.
I was on my way to the office today. (Sigh — working on a beautiful sunny Sunday. At least Marc and I got to take Baby Chloe to the park beforehand.)
Anyway, I was on my way in and saw protesters along Gloucester Road.
I read later on the South China Morning Post website that protesters tried to storm  the convention center, and that the police turned to using pepper spray.
This is very worrying.
I’ve always prided Hong Kongers on being peaceful, orderly demonstrators. We have the ability to take to the streets en masse — like during the 2003 Article 23 debate, or  annual commemorations of the June 4, 1989 Beijing crackdown. But it’s gotten a bit unruly recently.
I spoke to a HKU professor recently who said the same. He said that, after so many years of democracy protests going nowhere, the crowd is getting more aggressive. Meanwhile, the police were getting more aggressive, too. He said it’d turn ugly soon.
I hope not.
At the end of the day, do people really care how many wines Tang has in his illegal basement? Or that Tsang is retiring in style in Shenzhen? Or whether Leung is a CCP member? I don’t think so.
What angers people is — no matter what we find out about these guys, no matter who we like or don’t like — we can’t choose them.
It’s a sense of helplessness, and it’s an awful feeling.
There’s another worry. Whether or not Leung fulfills his promises to preserve freedoms in this city — we know he is not beholden to us since we didn’t choose him. 
We’re told that we can have the vote in 2017. I’ll believe it when I can walk to the polling booth behind my house, show my HKID, mark a piece of paper and put it in that little box. Until then, I’m staying skeptical.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Who wins our “elections”? Not us.

  1. BarryO says:

    Oh Democracy, it`s so last century. You probably know my standing already…I don`t want decisions (at least those a state can still affect in this globalized world) made by non-professionals.Letting loose a population with varied education and poor understanding of agendas only produces votes that are decided by trivial reasons. ..Like asking your cat which candidate for example.HK is not really that bad, 1200 out of 7 million elected the next CE. Compare that to another (democratic( country with over 350 million citizens that has their Pres elected by 50, some with multiple votes.Saying that, I`m off to paddle my new canoe.

  2. Anonymous says:

    BarryO has a point. even if HK has universal suffrage, I think the Central Govt can still think of a way to manipulate the votes so their favorite candidate can be elected, which is why DAB is getting strong support from not very educated lower class who is easily fooled into voting for whoever gives them advantages (e.g. various freebies)

  3. Foamier says:

    Are you a canoeist, Bazza, old chap?

  4. Joyce Lau says:

    Foamie / Fumie. For some reason, Blogger singles out your comments — and only your comments — with an alarming message about potential inappropriate comment. Why is that, Foamie? What have you done to offend Blogger?

  5. Foamier says:

    Perhaps "canoeist" has some foul double meaning that even we are not aware of?

  6. Joyce Lau says:

    Stop that. I now got another message saying your comments are "very suspicious."Maybe it's your new email address.Are you telling me that "bamboo" means something other than a Chinese plant?

  7. BarryO says:

    To answer Joycies question…I`m "chinese plant-zled" about Mr Foamies problems. :-)…Or maybe it's because he authors an adult rated blog.

  8. BarryO says:

    Not sure of any other canoe meaning but happy to be educated.It was a reference to a previous Joycie election post and my view of how Democracy doesn't work because voters get to vote. Everybody has a price and for many the bribe, I mean incentive, can be quite trivial.

  9. Foamier says:

    Would you like to "paddle" my "canoe", Joycey?

  10. BarryO says:

    Somebody is "up a creek without a paddle".Back to the topic…a bit like Democracy, by voting your giving away your paddle. Might be better to keep it oneself. Handy for bashing naughty boys on their the head. Hard to stand up to that.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s